Governance Structure
Decision-Making Process
Decisions are made through CHAI Majority Consensus (ISO Voting Standards).
Work Group Quorum applies for live decisions (50% + 1 majority); asynchronous decisions require notification of all members (HL7 Governance Manual).
Editing the Repository
Diversity of Committers: At least two committers from separate organizations will contribute to each use-case workgroup.
Ensure edits align with CHAI’s goals of inclusivity and transparency.
Roles and Responsibilities
CHAI Program Management: Oversees repository management and ensures alignment with organizational goals.
Work Group Committers: Represent diverse organizations and contribute expertise.
Version Control
v0.1: Initial content development in a private repository.
v0.2: Draft shared with CHAI Members for early review (5-7 business days before public release).
v1.0: Content pushed to public repository for continuous contributions + public feedback
v1.0+: Feedback is incorporated in future versions, as needed
For future versions:
Major revisions (e.g., v2.0): Significant changes like new UI, features, or conceptual updates.
Minor revisions (e.g., v1.1): Small updates, bug fixes, or minor features.
Key Terms
CHAI Majority Consensus: Decisions approved by two-thirds of participating members with no more than one-quarter negative votes (ISO Voting Standards).
CHAI Work Group Quorum: Decisions require a simple majority during live calls; asynchronous decisions assume abstention for non-responses (HL7 Governance Manual).